The reading “Playboy Joins the Battle of the
Sexes" was a fun reading. Things mentioned in this reading did not seem to
surprise me at all. Playboy has been very popular for many years and still a
big successful industry in today's society. Many males today view playboy as
something pleasurable, fun and exciting, same as the males in the 1960's. Even
though majority of the things we have been reading were in the 1950’s playboy
was just something else that added on to the rebel that took place during the
50’s.
Males
are supposed to be married, have a job and basically be the breadwinner, while
the women took care of the house work and the kids. Men were fed up, but this
was the norm during this time period. Many things occurred, in which males
rebelled against the norms, and playboy was one of them. Hugh Hefner created playboy
for males. This was supposed to be the fun males needed to have. “It was
something approaching a coherent program for the male rebellion; a critique of
marriage, a strategy for liberation…” It seems as though men wanted to get away
from their daily life and do what is best for them. I personally feel that
there is nothing wrong with that. Can there be other things to do other than
look at naked females, yes, but this is what they chose to do.
Playboy
is seen to go against marriage, something in which allow men to feel that they
can get into sexual relations without committing themselves. Because this is
one of the things playboy portrayed many women did not agree with it. Women may
not like playboy and I understand why. I mean having your husband not pay
attention to you and only focus on a naked female in a magazine or television
etc., what female would be a bit upset. As I said before I understand but at
the same time if it was vice versa and there was a popular magazine for
females, I know they would get them too and be fascinated by it. I know I would,
well not to the extent as males. Playboy as mentioned it was for fun and
something that males can enjoy indoors and not outdoors.
No comments:
Post a Comment